Advances and residual knowledge gaps in the neck management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients with advanced nodal disease undergoing definitive (chemo)radiotherapy for their primary.

PURPOSE: Substantial changes have been made in the neck management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC) in the past century. These have been fostered by changes in cancer epidemiology and technological progress in imaging, surgery, or radiotherapy, as well as disruptive concepts in oncology. We aimed to review changes in nodal management, with a focus on HNSCC patients with nodal involvement (cN+) undergoing (chemo)radiotherapy. METHODS: A narrative review was conducted to review current advances and address knowledge gaps in the multidisciplinary management of the cN+ neck in the context of (chemo)radiotherapy. RESULTS: Metastatic neck nodes are associated with poorer prognosis and poorer response to radiotherapy, and have therefore been systematically treated by surgery. Radical neck dissection (ND) has gradually evolved toward more personalized and less morbid approaches, i.e., from functional to selective ND. Omission of ND has been made feasible by use of positron-emission tomography/computed tomography to monitor the radiation response in cN+ patients. Human papillomavirus-driven oropharyngeal cancers and their cystic nodes have shown dramatically better prognosis than tobacco-related cancers, justifying a specific prognostic classification (AJCC) creation. Finally, considering the role of lymph nodes in anti-tumor immunity, de-escalation of ND and prophylactic nodal irradiation in combination are intense areas of investigation. However, the management of bulky cN3 disease remains an issue, as aggressive multidisciplinary strategies or innovative combined treatments have not yet significantly improved their prognosis. CONCLUSION: Personalized neck management is an increasingly important aspect of the overall therapeutic strategies in cN+ HNSCC.

International guidelines for intratumoral and intranodal injection of NBTXR3 nanoparticles in head and neck cancers.

BACKGROUND: An international multidisciplinary panel of experts aimed to provide consensus guidelines describing the optimal intratumoral and intranodal injection of NBTXR3 hafnium oxide nanoparticles in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) of the oral cavity, oropharynx, and cervical lymph nodes and to review data concerning safety, feasibility, and procedural aspects of administration. METHODS: The Delphi method was used to determine consensus. A 4-member steering committee and a 10-member monitoring committee wrote and revised the guidelines, divided into eight sections. An independent 3-member reading committee reviewed the recommendations. RESULTS: After two rounds of voting, strong consensus was obtained on all recommendations. Intratumoral and intranodal injection was deemed feasible. NBTXR3 volume calculation, choice of patients, preparation and injection procedure, potential side effects, post injection, and post treatment follow-up were described in detail. CONCLUSIONS: Best practices for the injection of NBTXR3 were defined, thus enabling international standardization of intratumoral nanoparticle injection.

International Expert-Based Consensus Definition, Staging Criteria, and Minimum Data Elements for Osteoradionecrosis of the Jaw: An Inter-Disciplinary Modified Delphi Study.

Purpose: Osteoradionecrosis of the jaw (ORNJ) is a severe iatrogenic disease characterized by bone death after radiation therapy (RT) to the head and neck. With over 9 published definitions and at least 16 diagnostic/staging systems, the true incidence and severity of ORNJ are obscured by lack of a standard for disease definition and severity assessment, leading to inaccurate estimation of incidence, reporting ambiguity, and likely under-diagnosis worldwide. This study aimed to achieve consensus on an explicit definition and phenotype of ORNJ and related precursor states through data standardization to facilitate effective diagnosis, monitoring, and multidisciplinary management of ORNJ. Methods: The ORAL Consortium comprised 69 international experts, including representatives from medical, surgical, radiation oncology, and oral/dental disciplines. Using a web-based modified Delphi technique, panelists classified descriptive cases using existing staging systems, reviewed systems for feature extraction and specification, and iteratively classified cases based on clinical/imaging feature combinations. Results: The Consortium ORNJ definition was developed in alignment with SNOMED-CT terminology and recent ISOO-MASCC-ASCO guideline recommendations. Case review using existing ORNJ staging systems showed high rates of inability to classify (up to 76%). Ten consensus statements and nine minimum data elements (MDEs) were outlined for prospective collection and classification of precursor/ORNJ stages. Conclusion: This study provides an international, consensus-based definition and MDE foundation for standardized ORNJ reporting in cancer survivors treated with RT. Head and neck surgeons, radiation, surgical, medical oncologists, and dental specialists should adopt MDEs to enable scalable health information exchange and analytics. Work is underway to develop both a human- and machine-readable knowledge representation for ORNJ (i.e., ontology) and multidisciplinary resources for dissemination to improve ORNJ reporting in academic and community practice settings.

Essential data variables for a minimum dataset for head and neck cancer trials and clinical research: HNCIG consensus recommendations and database.

The Head and Neck Cancer International Group (HNCIG) has undertaken an international modified Delphi process to reach consensus on the essential data variables to be included in a minimum database for HNC research. Endorsed by 19 research organisations representing 34 countries, these recommendations provide the framework to facilitate and harmonise data collection and sharing for HNC research. These variables have also been incorporated into a ready to use downloadable HNCIG minimum database, available from the HNCIG website.

Towards a European prospective data registry for particle therapy.

The evidence for the value of particle therapy (PT) is still sparse. While randomized trials remain a cornerstone for robust comparisons with photon-based radiotherapy, data registries collecting real-world data can play a crucial role in building evidence for new developments. This Perspective describes how the European Particle Therapy Network (EPTN) is actively working on establishing a prospective data registry encompassing all patients undergoing PT in European centers. Several obstacles and hurdles are discussed, for instance harmonization of nomenclature and structure of technical and dosimetric data and data protection issues. A preferred approach is the adoption of a federated data registry model with transparent and agile governance to meet European requirements for data protection, transfer, and processing. Funding of the registry, especially for operation after the initial setup process, remains a major challenge.

Impact of radiation therapy modalities on loco-regional control in inflammatory breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: In inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), radiotherapy intensification is considered a standard of care by some teams, although the level of evidence remains low. We sought to analyze the impact of radiotherapy modalities on the risk of loco-regional and distant relapse. METHODS: A retrospective multicenter study included patients with localized IBC treated between 2010 and 2017. Standard post-mastectomy radiotherapy consisted of daily fractions to a total dose of 50 Gy equivalent without a boost or bolus, while intensified radiotherapy referred to the use of a boost or bolus. The cumulative incidence curves of loco-regional and distant recurrence were displayed using the competing risk method. RESULTS: Of the 241 included patients, 165 were treated with standard and 76 with intensified radiotherapy. There was significantly more nodal involvement in the intensified group. With a median follow-up of 40 months post-radiotherapy, there was no difference between standard vs intensified radiotherapy regarding the cumulative incidence of loco-regional (p=0.68) or distant recurrence (p=0.29). At 5 years, the risks of loco-regional and distant recurrence were 12.1% (95% CI, 7.5; 17.7) and 29.4% (95% CI, 21.8; 37.3) for patients treated with standard radiotherapy and 10.4% (95% CI, 4.4; 19.3) and 21.4% (95% CI, 12.6; 31.9) for intensified radiotherapy. On multivariate analyses, triple-negative subtype and absence of complete pathological response (pCR) were associated with a higher risk of loco-regional recurrence. Radiotherapy intensification had no significant impact on loco-regional and distant recurrence. For non-pCR patients (n=172, 71.7%), no significant differences were observed between the two groups for loco-regional (p=0.80) and distant recurrence either (p=0.39). Severe toxicity rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to other important series, this large retrospective multicentric study did not show a loco-regional or distant control benefit of intensified radiotherapy. Pooled prospective studies and meta-analyses of intensified radiotherapy are warranted to endorse this approach.

[Issues and implementation of postoperative radiotherapy after flap reconstructive surgery in head and neck cancers]. / Enjeux et mise en œuvre de radiothérapie postopératoire après chirurgie reconstructrice avec lambeau dans les cancers de la tête et du cou.

The management of head and neck cancers is multidisciplinary, often relying on the use of combined treatments to maximize the chances of cure. Combined treatments are however also responsible for cumulative side effects. The aim of reconstructive surgery with a flap is to restore a function lost with the loss of substance from the tumor resection. However, changes in reconstructive surgery have impact of postoperative radiotherapy planning. The optimization of imaging protocols for radiotherapy planning should make it possible to identify postoperative changes and to distinguish flaps from surrounding native tissues to delineate the flaps and document the spontaneous evolution of these flaps or dose-effect relationships in case of radiotherapy. Such changes include atrophy, fibrosis of soft tissue flaps and osteoradionecrosis of bone flaps. Radiotherapy optimization also involves standardization of the definition of target volumes in situations where a flap is present, a situation that is increasingly common in routine care. This evolution of practice, beyond the essential multidisciplinary consultation meetings defining treatment indications, requires a close radio surgical collaboration with respect to technical aspects of the two disciplines. Doing so, anticipation of relapse and toxicity profiles could possibly lead to propose strategies for personalized de-escalation of multimodal treatments through interdisciplinary trials.

Twelve years after: The french national network on rare head and neck tumours (REFCOR).

BACKGROUND: Rare cancers constitute less than 10% of head and neck cancers and lack sufficient evidence for standardized care. The French Rare Head and Neck Cancer Expert Network (REFCOR) as established a national database to collect data on these rare cancers. This study aims to describe patient and tumour characteristics in this database. METHODS: Prospective data collection was conducted across multiple centers. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan Meier method and Log Rank test. Odds ratios were used for comparing proportions. RESULTS: A total of 7208 patients were included over a period of 10 years. The most frequent histologies were: Not Otherwise Specified (NOS) adenocarcinoma 13 %, adenoid cystic carcinoma 12 %, squamous cell carcinoma of rare locations 10 %, mucoepidermoid carcinoma 9 %, intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (8 %). Tumours were located in sinonasal area (38 %); salivary glands (32 %); oral cavity / oropharynx / nasopharynx (16 %); larynx / hypopharynx (3 %); ears (1 %); others (3 %). Tumours were predominantly classified as T4 (23 %), N0 (54 %), and M0 (62 %). Primary treatment approach involved tumour resection (78 %) and / or radiotherapy (63 %). Patients with salivary gland cancers exhibited better 5-year overall survival (OS) rates (p < 0.05), and lower recurrence rates compared to patients with sinonasal, laryngeal/ hypopharyngeal cancers. No significant differences were observed in the other comparisons. Acinar cell carcinoma demonstrated the best OS while mucous melanoma had the poorest prognosis. CONCLUSION: Melanoma, carcinoma NOS, and sinonasal undifferenciated carcinoma still have poor prognoses. Efforts are being made, including training and guidelines, to expand network coverage (REFCOR, EURACAN), improve data collection and contribute to personalized therapies.

[Prevention, diagnosis and management of osteoradionecrosis: Where do we stand?] / Prévention, diagnostic et prise en charge de l'ostéoradionécrose : où en est-on ?

Osteoradionecrosis (ORN) is a late secondary iatrogenic complication of external radiotherapy for cancers of the upper aero-digestive tract. Despite the systematization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and its potential for preserving salivary secretion and limiting the dose delivered to the supporting bone, ORN remains a feared and frequent complication. The objective of this literature review was to provide an overview of the management of ORN and to determine the key points that would make it possible to improve patient care. The diagnosis of ORN requires to eliminate tumor recurrence then is based on clinical arguments and imaging by CT or Cone Beam evolving in a chronic mode (more than 3-6 months). The harmonization of its classifications aims to offer comprehensive and multidisciplinary care as early as possible. Primary prevention is based on pre-therapeutic oral and dental preparation, then associated with fluoroprophylaxis if salivary recovery is insufficient and requires supervision of invasive dental care and prosthetic rehabilitation. Semi-automatic contouring tools make it possible to identify doses delivered to dental sectors and guide dental care with personalized dosimetric mapping. Conservative medical treatment is offered at an early stage where innovative medical treatments, highlighted by early studies, could be of interest in the future. In the event of advanced ORN, a non-conservative treatment is then proposed and frequently consists of interruptive mandibulectomy associated with reconstruction by bony free flap, the conditions of implantation remaining to be defined with the support of prospective clinical trials.

Early effects of different brain radiotherapy modalities on circulating leucocyte subpopulations in rodents.

PURPOSES: Lymphopenia is extensively studied, but not circulating leucocyte subpopulations, which however have distinct roles in tumor tolerance. Proton therapy has been shown to have a lesser impact on the immune system than conventional X-ray radiotherapy through lower dose exposure to healthy tissues. We explored the differential effects of brain X-ray and proton irradiation on circulating leucocyte subpopulations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Leucocyte subpopulation counts from tumor-free mice were obtained 12 hours after 4 fractions of 2.5 Gy. The relationships between irradiation type (X-rays or protons), irradiated volume (whole-brain/hemi-brain) and dose rate (1 or 2 Gy/min) with circulating leucocyte subpopulations (T-CD4+, T-CD8+, B, and NK-cells, neutrophils, and monocytes) were investigated using linear regression and tree-based modeling approaches. Relationships between dose maps (brain, vessels, lymph nodes (LNs)) and leucocyte subpopulations were analyzed and applied to construct the blood dose model, assessing the hypothesis of a direct lymphocyte-killing effect in radiation-induced lymphopenia. RESULTS: Radiation-induced lymphopenia occurred after X-ray but not proton brain irradiation in lymphoid subpopulations (T-CD4+, T-CD8+, B, and NK-cells). There was an increase in neutrophil counts following protons but not X-rays. Monocytes remained unchanged under both X-rays and protons. Besides irradiation type, irradiated volume and dose rate had a significant impact on NK-cell, neutrophil and monocyte levels but not T-CD4+, T-CD8+, and B-cells. The dose to the blood had a heterogeneous impact on leucocyte subpopulations: neutrophil counts remained stable with increasing dose to the blood, while lymphocyte counts decreased with increasing dose (T-CD8+-cells > T-CD4+-cells > B-cells > NK-cells). Direct cell-killing effect of the dose to the blood mildly contributed to radiation-induced lymphopenia. LN exposure significantly contributed to lymphopenia and partially explained the distinct impact of irradiation type on circulating lymphocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Leucocyte subpopulations reacted differently to X-ray or proton brain irradiation. This difference could be partly explained by LN exposure to radiation dose. Further researches and analyses on other biological processes and interactions between leucocyte subpopulations are ongoing. The various mechanisms underlying leucocyte subpopulation changes under different irradiation modalities may have implications for the choice of radiotherapy modalities and their combination with immunotherapy in brain cancer treatment.

[French national standard for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aero-digestive tract - General principles of treatment]. / Référentiel national de traitement des carcinomes épidermoïdes des voies aérodigestives supérieures ­ Principes généraux de traitement.

OBJECTIVES: The management of upper aerodigestive tract cancers is a complex specialty. It is essential to provide an update to establish optimal care. At the initiative of the INCa and under the auspices of the SFORL, the scientific committee, led by Professor Béatrix Barry, Dr. Gilles Dolivet, and Dr. Dominique De Raucourt, decided to develop a reference framework aimed at defining, in a scientific and consensus-based manner, the general principles of treatment for upper aerodigestive tract cancers applicable to all sub-locations. METHODOLOGY: To develop this framework, a multidisciplinary team of practitioners was formed. A systematic analysis of the literature was conducted to produce recommendations classified by grades, in accordance with the standards of the French National Authority for Health (HAS). RESULTS: The grading of recommendations according to HAS standards has allowed the establishment of a reference for patient care based on several criteria. In this framework, patients benefit from differentiated care based on prognostic factors they present (age, comorbidities, TNM status, HPV status, etc.), conditions of implementation, and quality criteria for indicated surgery (operability, resectability, margin quality, mutilation, salvage surgery), as well as quality criteria for radiotherapy (target volume, implementation time, etc.). The role of medical and postoperative treatments was also evaluated based on specific criteria. Finally, supportive care must be organized from the beginning and throughout the patients' care journey. CONCLUSION: All collected data have led to the development of a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing practices nationally, facilitating decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings, promoting equality in practices, and providing a state-of-the-art and reference practices for assessing the quality of care. This new framework is intended to be updated every 5 years to best reflect the latest advances in the field.

Cost-effectiveness of weekly adaptive radiotherapy versus standard IMRT in head and neck cancer alongside the ARTIX trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) comparing an adaptive radiotherapy (ART) strategy, based on weekly replanning, aiming to correct the parotid gland overdose during treatment and expecting therefore to decrease xerostomia, when compared to a standard IMRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted the ARTIX trial, a randomized, parallel-group, multicentric study comparing a systematic weekly replanning ART to a standard IMRT. The primary endpoint was the frequency of xerostomia at 12 months, measured by stimulating salivary flow with paraffin. The CEA was designed alongside the ARTIX trial which was linked to the French national health data system (SNDS). For each patient, healthcare consumptions and costs were provided by the SNDS. The reference case analysis was based on the primary endpoint of the trial. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 129 patients randomly assigned between 2013 and 2018, only 2 records were not linked to the SNDS, which provides a linkage proportion of 98.4%. All of the other 127 records were linked with good to very good robustness. On the intent-to-treat population at 12 months, mean total costs per patient were €41,564 (SD 23,624) and €33,063 (SD 16,886) for ART and standard IMRT arms, respectively (p = 0.033). Incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) was €162,444 per xerostomia avoided. At 24 months, ICER was €194,521 per xerostomia avoided. For both progression-free and overall survival, ART was dominated by standard IMRT. CONCLUSION: The ART strategy was deemed to be not cost-effective compared with standard IMRT for patients with locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer.

Carcinomas of the external auditory canal: Management and results: A multicenter REFCOR propensity score matching study.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse prognostic factors and survival outcomes of malignant tumors of the external auditory canal, to investigate the role of regional surgery, and adjuvant radiotherapy in early stages and to investigate the role of surgery in operable T4 stage. SETTING: A retrospective analysis was conducted on all patients prospectively included in the national database of the French Expertize Network for Rare ENT Cancers (REFCOR) from January 2000 to December 2016. PARTICIPANTS: 103 patients from 19 reference centers were included. A propensity score matching analysis was applied to enable comparisons between treatments. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Event-free survival, overall survival and factors of poor prognosis of the cohort were described. The interest of local and regional surgery and postoperative radiotherapy were evaluated. RESULTS: The factors of poor prognosis on event-free survival were immunosuppression (p = 0.002), Karnofsky status less than 90% (p = 0.02), body mass index less than 19 Kg / m2 (p = 0.0009), peripheric facial palsy (p = 0.0016), and positive margin (p = 0.0006). In early stages, locoregional surgery was associated with an increase in event-free survival (p = 0.003, HR = 0.21) versus local surgery alone, while postoperative radiotherapy was not associated with an increase in event-free survival (p = 0.86, HR = 0.91) or overall (p = 0.86, HR = 0.91). In locally advanced stages, locoregional surgery followed by radiotherapy was associated with an increase in event-free survival (p = 0.03, HR = 0.39) and overall (p = 0.02, HR = 0.34) versus chemoradiotherapy alone. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Regional surgery is recommended for early stages of cancers of the external auditory canal. In operable cases, locoregional surgery followed by radiotherapy is recommended.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A frequent and difficult-to-detect complication of radiotherapy for oropharyngeal cancers.

This pilot study reveals a higher prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) in patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with radiotherapy compared to the general population. OSAS indicators such as the Epworth Sleepiness Scale seem insufficient in the diagnostic approach to OSAS in this population and systematic screenings should be considered.

Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks.

PURPOSE: The discovery of X-rays was followed by a variety of attempts to treat infectious diseases and various other non-cancer diseases with ionizing radiation, in addition to cancer. There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the use of such radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases. Non-cancer diseases for which use of radiotherapy has currently been proposed include refractory ventricular tachycardia, neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease and dementia), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, all with ongoing clinical studies that deliver radiation doses of 0.5-25 Gy in a single fraction or in multiple daily fractions. In addition to such non-cancer effects, historical indications predominantly used in some countries (e.g. Germany) include osteoarthritis and degenerative diseases of the bones and joints. This narrative review gives an overview of the biological rationale and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies for radiotherapy proposed for various non-cancer diseases, discusses the plausibility of the proposed biological rationale, and considers the long-term radiation risks of cancer and non-cancer diseases. CONCLUSIONS: A growing body of evidence has suggested that radiation represents a double-edged sword, not only for cancer, but also for non-cancer diseases. At present, clinical evidence has shown some beneficial effects of radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia, but there is little or no such evidence of radiotherapy for other newly proposed non-cancer diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, COVID-19 pneumonia). Patients with ventricular tachycardia and COVID-19 pneumonia have thus far been treated with radiotherapy when they are an urgent life threat with no efficient alternative treatment, but some survivors may encounter a paradoxical situation where patients were rescued by radiotherapy but then get harmed by radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to justify the clinical use of radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases, and optimize dose to diseased tissue while minimizing dose to healthy tissue.

Handling missing covariates in observational studies: an illustration with the assessment of prognostic factors of survival outcomes in soft-tissue or visceral sarcomas in irradiated fields (SIF).

Background: Missing covariates are common in observational research and can lead to bias and loss of statistical power. Limited data regarding prognostic factors of survival outcomes of sarcomas in irradiated fields (SIF) are available. Because of the long lag time between irradiation of first cancer and scarcity of SIF, missing data are a critical issue when analyzing long-term outcomes. We assessed prognostic factors of overall (OS), progression-free (PFS), and metastatic-progression-free (MPFS) survivals in SIF using three methods to account for missing covariates. Methods: We relied on the NETSARC French Sarcoma Group database, Cox (OS/PFS), and competitive hazards (MPFS) survival models. Covariates investigated were age, sex, histological subtype, tumor size, depth and grade, metastasis, surgery, surgical resection, surgeon's expertise, imaging, and neo-adjuvant treatment. We first applied multiple imputation (MI): observed data were used to estimate the missing covariate. With the missing-data modality approach, a category missing was created for qualitative variables. With the complete-case (CC) approach, analysis was restricted to patients without missing covariates. Results: CC subjects (N = 167; 33%) presented more often with soft-tissue sarcoma (versus visceral sarcoma) and grade I-II tumors as compared to the 504 eligible cases. With MI (N = 504), factors associated with the worst outcome included metastasis (p = 0.04) and R1/R2 resection (p < 0.001) for OS; higher grade/non-gradable tumors (p = 0.002) and R1/R2 resection (p < 0.001) for PFS; and metastasis (p = 0.01) for M-PFS. The 'missing-data modality' approach (N = 504) led to different associations, including significance reached due to variables with the modality 'missing'. The CC analysis led to different results and reduced precision. Conclusion: The CC population was not representative of the eligible population, introducing bias, in addition to worst precision. The 'missing-data modality method' results in biased estimates in non-randomized studies, as outcomes may be related to variables with missing values. Appropriate statistical methods for missing covariates, for example, MI, should therefore be considered.

A Comprehensive Primer on Radiation Oncology for Non-Radiation Oncologists.

Background: Multidisciplinary management is crucial in cancer diagnosis and treatment. Multidisciplinary teams include specialists in surgery, medical therapies, and radiation therapy (RT), each playing unique roles in oncology care. One significant aspect is RT, guided by radiation oncologists (ROs). This paper serves as a detailed primer for non-oncologists, medical students, or non-clinical investigators, educating them on contemporary RT practices. Methods: This report follows the process of RT planning and execution. Starting from the decision-making in multidisciplinary teams to the completion of RT and subsequent patient follow-up, it aims to offer non-oncologists an understanding of the RO's work in a comprehensive manner. Results: The first step in RT is a planning session that includes obtaining a CT scan of the area to be treated, known as the CT simulation. The patients are imaged in the exact position in which they will receive treatment. The second step, which is the primary source of uncertainty, involves the delineation of treatment targets and organs at risk (OAR). The objective is to ensure precise irradiation of the target volume while sparing the OARs as much as possible. Various radiation modalities, such as external beam therapy with electrons, photons, or particles (including protons and carbon ions), as well as brachytherapy, are utilized. Within these modalities, several techniques, such as three-dimensional conformal RT, intensity-modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy, scattering beam proton therapy, and intensity-modulated proton therapy, are employed to achieve optimal treatment outcomes. The RT plan development is an iterative process involving medical physicists, dosimetrists, and ROs. The complexity and time required vary, ranging from an hour to a week. Once approved, RT begins, with image-guided RT being standard practice for patient alignment. The RO manages acute toxicities during treatment and prepares a summary upon completion. There is a considerable variance in practices, with some ROs offering lifelong follow-up and managing potential late effects of treatment. Conclusions: Comprehension of RT clinical effects by non-oncologists providers significantly elevates long-term patient care quality. Hence, educating non-oncologists enhances care for RT patients, underlining this report's importance.

Immunotherapy and Hypofractionated Radiotherapy in Older Patients with Locally Advanced Cutaneous Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: A Proposed Paradigm by the International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group.

Cutaneous skin carcinoma is a disease of older patients. The prevalence of cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (cSCC) increases with age. The head and neck region is a frequent place of occurrence due to exposure to ultraviolet light. Surgical resection with adjuvant radiotherapy is frequently advocated for locally advanced disease to decrease the risk of loco-regional recurrence. However, older cancer patients may not be candidates for surgery due to frailty and/or increased risk of complications. Radiotherapy is usually advocated for unresectable patients. Compared to basal-cell carcinoma, locally advanced cSCC tends to recur locally and/or can metastasize, especially in patients with high-risk features such as poorly differentiated histology and perineural invasion. Thus, a new algorithm needs to be developed for older patients with locally advanced head and neck cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma to improve their survival and conserve their quality of life. Recently, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) has attracted much attention due to the high prevalence of program death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in cSCC. A high response rate was observed following CPI administration with acceptable toxicity. Those with residual disease may be treated with hypofractionated radiotherapy to minimize the risk of recurrence, as radiotherapy may enhance the effect of immunotherapy. We propose a protocol combining CPIs and hypofractionated radiotherapy for older patients with locally advanced cutaneous head and neck cancer who are not candidates for surgery. Prospective studies should be performed to verify this hypothesis.